h1

1990 PLC (C.S) 25

NAEEMUL ZAMAN

V/S

PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION


Discipline) Rules, 1973, Rules 5 & 6 — Disciplinary proceedings — Authorised Officer taking positive decision to proceed against employee in accordance with provisions of Rule 5(i)(ii) of the Efficiency and Discipline rules, 1973 as such provisions of Rule 6 of the Rules were to regulate all subsequent disciplinary proceedings and they were to be complied with — Procedure as described in Rule 6, having not been followed, disciplinary proceedings taken as also consequential order of dismissal of employee from service were not taken and passed in accordance with law — Proceedings taken against employee were thus set aside by the High Court in exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: